Luis Octavio
CV ↓
Building Fintech From Zero

Fintech · DINN (Actinver) · Nov 2018 – Oct 2020 (founding)

Building Fintech From Zero

DINN had near-zero users after two years. The instinct was to pivot. We did the research instead. What we found dismantled every assumption the product was built on — and built a better one.

0 → 500K+Usersin 2 years
~4 monthsBreakevenahead of plan
+60% YoYAUM growth (product-driven)
01

Impact

500K+
Users
From near-zero in 2 years
~4 months
Breakeven ahead of plan
Versus the board-approved model
+60%
AUM growth YoY
Assets under management
Play ▶
02

Context

Company: DINN — Actinver's digital investment app for first-time investors in Mexico

My role: Product & Visual Designer on the founding team for DINN 2.0. I owned the brand identity — logo, visual system, color, typography, tone of voice — and designed the first version and iterations of the product. The broader strategy and product definition were collaborative — every design decision went through business, legal, and growth before shipping.

Timeline: November 2018 – October 2020, founding phase.

The business context: Actinver's average client was 54 years old. More than half of their assets under management were held by clients over 60. The millennial segment was a real and unaddressed market opportunity — a younger audience that competitors were starting to move into. DINN was Actinver's answer to that gap.

03

The Problem

DINN 1.0 had been live for almost two years. It had near-zero users.

The product was functional. The problem was that no one had actually asked young Mexicans why they weren't investing or how they wanted to invest.

Hypothesis — Before research
"Young people don't invest because they don't have money, prefer to spend it, or think it's too complicated."
Assumed lack of money was the barrier
Assumed spending preference over saving
Assumed complexity was the deterrent
Finding — After research
"The barrier wasn't money or interest. It was an understanding problem."
72% of young Mexicans 18–35 already save
68% keep savings in a bank — not invested
70% said they don't know enough to start

That single insight rewrote the entire product direction.

04

The Research

We ran a research process that involved:

50+
User Interviews
Financial behavior, money habits, saving vs. investing — one-on-one
~3
Focus Groups
Perceptions, emotional barriers, reactions to early concepts
20+
Fintechs Benchmarked
Global and Mexican, mapped by communication territory and positioning

Almost every competitor in Mexico was communicating in functional territory — rates, features, security badges. Nobody had claimed the emotional and educational space. Nobody was talking to young people about their relationship with money.

What the research actually told us about the target:

Segment A
70%
Achievers
4 million people · NSE C
Motivated by money and status. They want to see their progress and feel they're winning.
Key message
Returns · Earnings
Segment B
30%
Avant Garde
500,000 people · NSE C+
Early adopters, influence-driven, skeptical of mass culture. They need to understand before they act.
Key message
Security · Ease · Understanding
05

The Core Design Decisions

1. Don't build for investors. Build for savers who don't know they can invest.

The research showed that the people we wanted to reach already had the behavior (saving). They didn't have the mental model (investing). The product had to meet them where they were.

Product thesis: Simple savings account + you earn returns. One step, no complexity, no minimum. A savings account that also makes your money grow.

2. Own the emotional territory no competitor was claiming.

Every Mexican competitor was talking about rates, features, and functionality. We positioned DINN at the intersection of simple and earning: "DINN: Simple + Your money earns."

Brand House
PurposeCreate the habit of investing
RoleHelp people with their financial growth
TerritorySimplicity — understanding what you're doing and why
PersonalityMentor — wisdom, trust, security, honesty
Tagline"Que tu dinero crezca contigo" — Let your money grow with you.
Non-negotiable attributes
No minimum investmentNo fees100% digital — intuitive by design

3. Design the behavioral change, not just the product.

We used BJ Fogg's Behavior Model from Stanford's Persuasive Tech Lab as the framework for the launch strategy. For a behavior to happen, three things need to converge: Motivation, Ability, and a Trigger.

We mapped all three:

01
Motivation
Show people they're already close to investing — they just don't know it.
02
Ability
Remove every possible barrier. 100% digital opening, no minimum, 3 actions max.
03
Trigger
Acquisition campaigns tied to specific moments and contexts.
DINN v1 screens — visual system before the redesign
BFZ-DEC-01b--4
BFZ-DEC-01c--4
BFZ-DEC-01d--4
BFZ-DEC-01e--4
BFZ-DEC-01f--4
BFZ-DEC-01g--4
BFZ-DEC-01h--4
06

Process

01
Understand
Why did DINN 1.0 fail? Sound product, wrong positioning, wrong communication, broken account opening.
02
Research
50+ user interviews and a around 3 focus groups, plus a competitive audit of 20+ fintechs across communication territory.
03
Strategy
Full brand strategy from research: personas, Brand House, communication territories, product attributes, tagline.
04
Brand & Product Design
Logo, visual identity, color, typography, iconography, tone of voice. Onboarding, dashboard, deposit and withdrawal flows.
05
Product Definition
Single investment fund. 100% digital opening. 3 user actions only: deposit, check balance, withdraw. No minimums, no fees.
06
Pilot Launch
Querétaro primary — 49% NSE match, 70% employment rate, 3rd highest mobile banking penetration in Mexico. Zero paid marketing.

The brand and the product were designed in parallel. The visual identity had to communicate simplicity and credibility simultaneously — a difficult balance in fintech. Every element went through user testing before development started.

Brand identity system — logo, palette, typography, iconography, applications
BFZ-PRO-01d--3
BFZ-PRO-01h--3
BFZ-PRO-01b--3
BFZ-PRO-01e--3
Play ▶
BFZ-PRO-01c--3
BFZ-PRO-01g--3

The product became the simplest in the market. You sign up, deposit, and your money is automatically invested. The process was simple and functional.

App v1 Onboarding — 100% digital account opening flow
BFZ-PRO-02c
App v1 Dashboard — balance and returns at a glance
BFZ-PRO-02b
BFZ-PRO-02d
BFZ-PRO-03b

A few months later in 2019, we launched the DINN debit card so users could use their money day to day.

App v1 Deposit & withdrawal flows
DINN 2.0 — Onboarding100% digital account opening — no branch visit required
< 2 minAverage completion
100%Digital — zero paperworkv1 (2017) required an in-person step
5 stepsPhone → account open
Phone & identity
Official ID + selfie
Profile & tax info
Review
Account open
Deposit
Withdrawal
Rendering…
07

Key Deliverables

Research synthesis
50+ interviews · around 3 focus groups
Dismantled the wrong assumptions. Built the right ones.
Competitive positioning map
20+ fintechs — global + Mexico
Identified the emotional territory no competitor was occupying.
Brand House + Personas
Achievers (70%) · Avant Garde (30%)
Differentiated messaging per segment, grounded in behavioral data.
Product thesis + feature definition
3 actions · no minimums · no fees · 100% digital
"Simple + Your money earns" — everything else was cut.
Brand identity system
Logo · Color · Type · Icons · Voice
Built from scratch to communicate simplicity and credibility at once.
First product version — 4 core flows
Onboarding · Dashboard · Deposit · Withdrawal
Validated with users before development started.
08

Outcome

BFZ-OUT-HERO--full

The pilot ran from October to December 2019 — no paid marketing.

The financial model projected a breakeven target by September 2022. DINN hit breakeven around 4 months ahead of plan. Then the economics started compounding.

09

Reflection

The most important work happened before any design tool was opened. Every decision that came after — the brand, the product, the acquisition strategy, the board pitch — traced back to what we learned in those 50+ interviews and around 3 focus groups.

DINN 1.0 failed not because the product was poorly built, but because it was built on assumptions that hadn't been tested. Testing them first changed everything downstream.

The product wasn't just about features. It was about removing the barriers that prevented a behavior from happening in the first place. That frame — Fogg's Motivation + Ability + Trigger — is the most useful design model I've used in fintech.