Luis Octavio
CV ↓

FromRebrandtoProductSystem

92%

Perceived increased security

100 users tested (50 existing, 50 new)

85%+

Trust, calmness, and simplicity

consistent across all perception dimensions

From Rebrand to Product System
01

Impact

A product that felt inconsistent and a little playful became one that actually felt like a place to put your money.

92%
Perceived increased security
Validated across 100 users (50 existing clients, 50 new users)
90%
Associated with calmness & stability
Perception shifted: playful → trustworthy
85%
Perceived improved simplicity
Reduced cognitive load, new and existing users
88%
Felt increased trust & transparency
The most critical metric in a financial product
Side-by-side — misma pantalla clave, sistema anterior vs. nuevo
RPS-IMP-01b
02

Context

Company

DINN — Actinver's digital investment app for first-time investors in Mexico

Timeline

H2 2022 — DINN had completed a brand redesign. The product experience had to be rebuilt.

My Role

Ran the internal audit, defined the new visual system, and coordinated implementation across the entire app and website.

Built the governance documentation the team still uses today.

Team

UX/UI designers, illustrators, communication team, external audit vendor, product stakeholders

03

The Problem

The product had grown fast — more clients, more screens, a bigger team — and visual consistency broke. In a financial product, inconsistency isn't just visual. It feels unsafe.

A qualitative study showed DINN read as "inversión chiquita" — a small, everyday tool — no matter how sophisticated the user.

The approachability worked. But it set a ceiling.

The product as it was
"Bright colors, decorative illustrations, low visual hierarchy — playful and approachable."
Approachability was working — first-timers felt welcome
But it was setting a ceiling on how seriously users took the product
Experienced investors were using it as a side account, not a main platform
The design challenge
"Maturity without rigidity. Clear without being overwhelming."
Accessible enough for first-timers who've never invested
Substantial enough for users to grow into a main platform
Trustworthy enough that users feel safe putting their money in
RPS-PRB-01a
RPS-PRB-01c
RPS-PRB-01e
RPS-PRB-01g
RPS-PRB-01j
RPS-PRB-01b
RPS-PRB-01d
RPS-PRB-01f
RPS-PRB-01h
RPS-PRB-01k
04

Diagnosis

Two visual audits, run simultaneously — one mine, one external. I didn't want the findings to be only my perspective, or only an outside one.

01
Internal Audit
Designed and run in-house
Mapped every UI pattern across the app — color usage, typography hierarchy, illustration style, spacing, component behavior.
Documented every point where brand guidelines were being ignored, stretched, or misapplied.
02
External Audit
Independent vendor
Brought in outside perspective to validate findings and catch structural gaps that internal familiarity had stopped us from seeing.
Both audits reached the same conclusion: the visual system was actively working against trust perception.
Audit findings
RPS-DGN-01b
RPS-DGN-01d
RPS-DGN-01c
RPS-DGN-01e
05

What I Built

A system that works for any designer, on any screen, without needing me in the room.

01
Color governance
Not just which colors to use — how much of each and when. That one change alone fixed most of the visual noise.
02
Typography hierarchy
Clearer type scale, tighter rules for headings, body, and supporting text. Every screen needed to communicate priority clearly.
03
Illustration direction
Calmer, more grounded compositions. Less decoration that adds visual weight without adding meaning.
04
Spacing and layout
Consistent grids and spacing logic. The visual rhythm users feel but don't consciously notice.
05
Tone by context
Rules for how the visual tone shifts across moments: onboarding, portfolio view, alerts, educational content.
System documentation
RPS-SYS-01b
RPS-SYS-01d
RPS-SYS-01f
RPS-SYS-01c
RPS-SYS-01e
RPS-SYS-01g
06

Validation

I tested the new system with 100 users (50 existing clients, 50 new) before rolling anything out. In a financial product, you don't ship on instinct.

01
Participants
100
50 existing DINN clients
50 new users — no prior exposure to the product
02
Method
Comparative testing
Old visual system shown against the new one — same screens, same context, different system.
03
Result
Every key trust metric moved in the right direction
Consistently across both user groups — before a single screen shipped to production.
New app screens in real context
07

Execution

I led implementation across the full product, coordinating illustrators, UX/UI designers, and the communication team under one direction so the system applied consistently everywhere.

Governance manual + app implementation
RPS-EXE-01c
RPS-EXE-01b
RPS-EXE-01d
08

Key Deliverables

Visual Audit Reports
Internal + External
Evidence-based diagnosis of perception and consistency gaps — not just one perspective.
Product Visual System
Color · Type · Spacing · Illustration · Imagery
The full ruleset for how the product looks, feels, and shifts tone across contexts.
Brand Governance Documentation
Still in use today
Scalable reference built for the team — with rationale, not just rules.
Full App & Website Implementation
Every screen, every touchpoint
Cohesive product experience aligned with brand maturity. Coordinated across designers, illustrators, and communications.
09

Outcome

92% of tested users perceived the product as more secure; trust, calmness, and simplicity scored 85%+ across every dimension. The documentation is the part I'm proudest of — it's still in use today, a real system the team keeps building on.

"After" collage
RPS-OUT-01c
RPS-OUT-01e
RPS-OUT-01g
RPS-OUT-01b
RPS-OUT-01d
RPS-OUT-01f
10

Reflection

Users don't process trust rationally — they feel it. Color proportions, spacing, illustration tone aren't aesthetic preferences. They're the product. You can update the logo and the guidelines, but if the product doesn't reflect the new brand, nothing actually changes.